luxury watches for men 2011 image
Numb
Aquilani should be given his chances!!!!!!!!! He is the only technically gifted midfielder in Liverpool.
I like him. For what he did in the past. I just don't want to see Henderson getting 1st place when there are some better players than him.
Answer
The squad is packed full of professionals who are paid insane amounts of money each week to perform and play well for the fans - the manager can only steer and direct and utilise the resources made available to him to the best of his ability.
After all that success he had during his first stint at the club as manager, I find it shocking that you are indreictly questioning his ability to manage at the top level, by playing the 'aquilani' card.
That man will get his chance - and when he does he better take it otherwise there are plenty of other players who are hungry for theirs (chance).
So he'll have to sit out and wait - the manager knows best when to use what players, right now its not Alberto's time - he'll be used when the team has started playing a good passing game moving the ball about quickly and attacking well, thats when I think we can use Alberto to best effect - as a luxury if u like, right now he's not the right player to bring into the 1st team imo.
So early on in the season - points on the board is all that matters, a good start is essential so that we don't lose pace at hte top amongst the big boys like United, City and Chelsea.
That means picking teams who are very hard to break-down and beat, thats why Kenny went for a tough midfield setup in Adam, Lucas, Kuyt and Henderson in the first game - complete faith in the 2 new boys because they're sound players.
I'm a big fan - massive fan of Alberto Aquiliani myself, i think his technical game is a notch or two above many of the foreign players in the EPL but hes not been able to express and show that as much as he wanted to when Rafa signed him 2 years ago.
We did the right thing by releasing him to Juve - the gamble paid off in that he got fit again from playing regularly, and even if they didnt buy him - other Italian clubs would have him high on their shopping list, even if they didn't - we'd have the luxury of a now FIT Aquiliani ready and available - an extra bit of steel in midfield.
introducing Alberto in game 3 could potentialy upset and destablise whats looking like a steady ship, thats the last thing a manager like Kenny would do.
He already has an idea of what our strongest XI is - and has 2 or 3 variations of our strongest XI which over the courseo fthe season will be used, thanks to the some exceptional cover in midfield and defence.
Teams don't win titles - Squads do.
Judge the squad by the end of this season. Maxi Rodriguez has shown good attitude by saying 'he welcomes the competition' and will fight for his place instead of sulk. thats great.
Joe Cole, Steven Gerrard, Jonjo Shelvey, Jay Spearing Cristian Poulsen are a MIDFIELD setup of its own lol
we have two midfields lol
im not discussing titles, cups, silverware or 4th spot nonsence right now - ffs we've only played our 2nd game of the 2011/12 EPL Campaign the league began just 2 weeks ago remember ?
just watch the team game by game and thats all - we'll know when we have NO chance of winning,achieving something when that time comes - right now, we can only beat the teams put out against us nothing more.
The squad is packed full of professionals who are paid insane amounts of money each week to perform and play well for the fans - the manager can only steer and direct and utilise the resources made available to him to the best of his ability.
After all that success he had during his first stint at the club as manager, I find it shocking that you are indreictly questioning his ability to manage at the top level, by playing the 'aquilani' card.
That man will get his chance - and when he does he better take it otherwise there are plenty of other players who are hungry for theirs (chance).
So he'll have to sit out and wait - the manager knows best when to use what players, right now its not Alberto's time - he'll be used when the team has started playing a good passing game moving the ball about quickly and attacking well, thats when I think we can use Alberto to best effect - as a luxury if u like, right now he's not the right player to bring into the 1st team imo.
So early on in the season - points on the board is all that matters, a good start is essential so that we don't lose pace at hte top amongst the big boys like United, City and Chelsea.
That means picking teams who are very hard to break-down and beat, thats why Kenny went for a tough midfield setup in Adam, Lucas, Kuyt and Henderson in the first game - complete faith in the 2 new boys because they're sound players.
I'm a big fan - massive fan of Alberto Aquiliani myself, i think his technical game is a notch or two above many of the foreign players in the EPL but hes not been able to express and show that as much as he wanted to when Rafa signed him 2 years ago.
We did the right thing by releasing him to Juve - the gamble paid off in that he got fit again from playing regularly, and even if they didnt buy him - other Italian clubs would have him high on their shopping list, even if they didn't - we'd have the luxury of a now FIT Aquiliani ready and available - an extra bit of steel in midfield.
introducing Alberto in game 3 could potentialy upset and destablise whats looking like a steady ship, thats the last thing a manager like Kenny would do.
He already has an idea of what our strongest XI is - and has 2 or 3 variations of our strongest XI which over the courseo fthe season will be used, thanks to the some exceptional cover in midfield and defence.
Teams don't win titles - Squads do.
Judge the squad by the end of this season. Maxi Rodriguez has shown good attitude by saying 'he welcomes the competition' and will fight for his place instead of sulk. thats great.
Joe Cole, Steven Gerrard, Jonjo Shelvey, Jay Spearing Cristian Poulsen are a MIDFIELD setup of its own lol
we have two midfields lol
im not discussing titles, cups, silverware or 4th spot nonsence right now - ffs we've only played our 2nd game of the 2011/12 EPL Campaign the league began just 2 weeks ago remember ?
just watch the team game by game and thats all - we'll know when we have NO chance of winning,achieving something when that time comes - right now, we can only beat the teams put out against us nothing more.
teen start a collection of watches?
lawliet411
Im a little new in the world of watches and im was wondering how can a teen start his own watch collection.my father say to star small and then passing the year have great watches like rolex and omegas and other kinds.
its this a way to start
Answer
I own over 50 watches now that were made 1893 to recently. You need to study watches, so you know the brands and thus can recognize good deals when you encounter them. I look at "International Watch", "Chronos", "Watch Time", etc. magazines at newsstands and often buy them. I also have some watch almanacs, e.g. "Wristwatch Annual", 1999 to 2011. There are some books you should add to your collection, if you're serious about collecting watches. Look at libraries and bookstores to see what is available in your location. I buy some Japanese, French and German watch mags, for I speak several languages. Look at pawn shops, flea markets, garage sales, estate sales, auctions, etc. as I do all over the country. I've written five basic books about watches with several updated editions of each book. Now, I'm working on the fifth edition of "THE COSTLIEST WATCH BRANDS" for 2012. I finished earlier editions in 1996, 1999, 2002 and 2007. In the third edition, the costliest brands were 1. Breguet, 2. Patek Philippe, 3. Vacheron Constantin. Rolex has placed 18th, 24th, 41at and now 48th for 2012. Omega is a bit cheaper than Rolex. Both brands are what I call lower level luxury brands. Today I'm wearing a Vacheron Constantin "Les Historiques, Ellipse" that cost $10,290 in 1994. In 2011, it would cost $29,300 if it was still made. A couple of years ago, a comparable Rolex "Cellini" cost $8200. Thus, my VC is about 3.5 times costlier than a Rolex of the same type. Yesterday, I wore a Cartier "Santos Dumont" that costs $14,450 in 2011 or about 1.8 times more than a similar Rolex. Rolex is over-rated. It spends $47 million a year on advertising in the USA, so everyone had heard of it. There are much better brands. My book tells about that.
At a little hole in the wall store in the wino area of San Francisco (on Market between 6th and 7th Sts.), I saw a Jaeger-LeCoultre 1950s "Memovox". I had just looked at some on Sutter St. that cost $2500-$3000. It was in better shape. I asked the price and almost drooled when the man told me $200. I tried to make it seem he was besting me. I bought it and took it to Shapur the JLC dealer in SF to order a leather strap with buckle that cost $250 in 1996- more than the watch. Now, a new watch like it costs $9600, and I have $450 in it. You should study as I have, so that you can recognize such great deals as this one. I can tell about others too.
I own over 50 watches now that were made 1893 to recently. You need to study watches, so you know the brands and thus can recognize good deals when you encounter them. I look at "International Watch", "Chronos", "Watch Time", etc. magazines at newsstands and often buy them. I also have some watch almanacs, e.g. "Wristwatch Annual", 1999 to 2011. There are some books you should add to your collection, if you're serious about collecting watches. Look at libraries and bookstores to see what is available in your location. I buy some Japanese, French and German watch mags, for I speak several languages. Look at pawn shops, flea markets, garage sales, estate sales, auctions, etc. as I do all over the country. I've written five basic books about watches with several updated editions of each book. Now, I'm working on the fifth edition of "THE COSTLIEST WATCH BRANDS" for 2012. I finished earlier editions in 1996, 1999, 2002 and 2007. In the third edition, the costliest brands were 1. Breguet, 2. Patek Philippe, 3. Vacheron Constantin. Rolex has placed 18th, 24th, 41at and now 48th for 2012. Omega is a bit cheaper than Rolex. Both brands are what I call lower level luxury brands. Today I'm wearing a Vacheron Constantin "Les Historiques, Ellipse" that cost $10,290 in 1994. In 2011, it would cost $29,300 if it was still made. A couple of years ago, a comparable Rolex "Cellini" cost $8200. Thus, my VC is about 3.5 times costlier than a Rolex of the same type. Yesterday, I wore a Cartier "Santos Dumont" that costs $14,450 in 2011 or about 1.8 times more than a similar Rolex. Rolex is over-rated. It spends $47 million a year on advertising in the USA, so everyone had heard of it. There are much better brands. My book tells about that.
At a little hole in the wall store in the wino area of San Francisco (on Market between 6th and 7th Sts.), I saw a Jaeger-LeCoultre 1950s "Memovox". I had just looked at some on Sutter St. that cost $2500-$3000. It was in better shape. I asked the price and almost drooled when the man told me $200. I tried to make it seem he was besting me. I bought it and took it to Shapur the JLC dealer in SF to order a leather strap with buckle that cost $250 in 1996- more than the watch. Now, a new watch like it costs $9600, and I have $450 in it. You should study as I have, so that you can recognize such great deals as this one. I can tell about others too.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers

